Authentic Jeans Forums banner

FARCO 87Q Fit Review

3K views 12 replies 5 participants last post by  User Name 
#1 ·
Okay.

Got my pair of 29w 87Q from Yoox today. When I tried them on I was pleasantly suprised. They do not fit as loose in the thigh from info I have gathered on the site. I only have one other pair of Farcos (85W) to compare this to. That being said, the waist seems to run more TTS than the 85W. Thighs are slightly looser, however NOT significantly. Also, the leg opening is slightly larger than the 85w, which is prob why the thigh is also a little larger as well.

Measurements below for reference:

Farco 87Q (29w) - BNWT

Waist - 15"
Rise - 9.5"
Thigh - 11.5"
Leg opening - 8.2"

Farco 85W (29w) - Worn twice, never washed.

Waist - 15.5"
Rise - 9.5"
Thigh - 11.2"
Leg opening - 8"

So, if you have bigger thighs sticking w/ your regular farco/zathan size maybe wise. Time shall tell how much they will stretch...

And, of course... Pics:



Hope this helps others in their 87Q quest!
 
See less See more
1
#11 ·
vincevtec said:
Wow, so your 85W was looser than the 81W in the same size?

You may like the 87Q ceb, there is more room in the thigh, but the waist is tighter. Also, you don't have to peel them off the like the 85W, haha.

my 87qs are on their way buddy ;) my 85ws fit perfectly though... so I might need to do some shrinking for the 87qs...

what's the actual inseam of your 87qs btw? I'm assuming you have a 32 inseam....
 
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top